John 9:33

ESV If this man were not from God, he could do nothing."
NIV If this man were not from God, he could do nothing."
NASB If this man were not from God, He could do nothing.'
CSB If this man were not from God, he wouldn’t be able to do anything."
NLT If this man were not from God, he couldn’t have done it.'
KJV If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.
NKJV If this Man were not from God, He could do nothing.”

What does John 9:33 mean?

When Jesus healed a man born blind, His religious critics responded in a predictable way. Jesus had already challenged them for willful ignorance (John 7:17) and for "refusing" to follow their own Scriptures to believe in Him (John 5:39–40). Here, these men have twice interrogated the healed man (John 9:13, 24), looking for any reason to dismiss Jesus' work. The formerly blind beggar responded with unexpected bravery and remarkably clear thinking. His overall point—delivered with heavy sarcasm—has been that Jesus' miracles themselves ought to be evidence enough that He's been sent by God.

Here, the healed man is clear and direct. This is almost identical to the conclusion Nicodemus brought to Jesus earlier in the gospel of John (John 3:1–2). This verse is the summary of the man's response to the insults of the scribes and Pharisees (John 9:28), who tried to reject Jesus as a "sinner" instead of accepting His miracles (John 9:16, 24–25).

At this point, the religious leaders of Jerusalem have been thoroughly embarrassed. They failed to debunk Jesus' miracle. They responded with a childish rant against a witness (John 9:28). Worst, they've been "taught" common sense spiritual truth by a man they consider beneath them (John 7:49).

What happens next (John 9:34) is exactly the reaction one would expect from spiritual hypocrites. Rather than countering the man's argument or challenging his facts, they resort once again to insults.
Expand
Context Summary
John 9:13–34 describes the Pharisees' reaction to Jesus' healing of a man born blind. Rather than being swayed by an obvious sign of divine power, they look for excuses and criticisms to discredit the miracle. They interrogate the man's parents, who timidly defer back to their son. The healed man knows nothing more than this: ''though I was blind, now I see.'' His matter-of-fact responses to the Pharisees highlights their obvious prejudice. As a result, they excommunicate the healed man from the synagogue. Jesus will meet with the man in the next passage to give more context for the miracle.
Expand
Chapter Summary
Jesus encounters a man who has been blind his entire life. Consistent with notions of that era, the disciples assume the disability is due to some specific sin: either the man's or his parents'. Jesus challenges this idea and heals the man. His restoration leads to interrogation. The Pharisees try to discredit Jesus' miraculous work. The healed man's simple, straightforward perspective embarrasses the religious leaders, who excommunicate him in frustration. Jesus meets with the healed man, explaining more about His identity and the purpose of His ministry. Jesus also reminds the Pharisees that those who ought to know better, spiritually, will be held more accountable as a result.
Expand
What is the Gospel?
Download the app: