Chapter
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Verse

Daniel 6:15

ESV Then these men came by agreement to the king and said to the king, “Know, O king, that it is a law of the Medes and Persians that no injunction or ordinance that the king establishes can be changed.”
NIV Then the men went as a group to King Darius and said to him, 'Remember, Your Majesty, that according to the law of the Medes and Persians no decree or edict that the king issues can be changed.'
NASB Then these men came by agreement to the king and said to the king, 'Recognize, O king, that it is a law of the Medes and Persians that no injunction or statute which the king establishes may be changed.'
CSB Then these men went together to the king and said to him, "You know, Your Majesty, that it is a law of the Medes and Persians that no edict or ordinance the king establishes can be changed."
NLT In the evening the men went together to the king and said, 'Your Majesty, you know that according to the law of the Medes and the Persians, no law that the king signs can be changed.'
KJV Then these men assembled unto the king, and said unto the king, Know, O king, that the law of the Medes and Persians is, That no decree nor statute which the king establisheth may be changed.

What does Daniel 6:15 mean?

Jealous rivals tricked Darius, king over Babylon, into passing an unchangeable law secretly meant to target Daniel (Daniel 6:1–9). The king was distraught when he realized what had happened, but his culture did not allow such decrees to be changed. Nor could they be overruled or defied (Daniel 6:10–13; Esther 8:8). Now, the conspirators have returned to press the king to make good on his own law. He cannot delay any longer. Rather than disrupt established law, he will sentence Daniel to be locked into an enclosure with lions (Daniel 6:16).

By referring again to the irrevocable law of the Medes and the Persians, Daniel's accusers are appealing to Darius's reputation. How would it look to his subjects if he blatantly countered the principles of his own kingdom? Even worse to do so for a disobedient Jewish exile (Daniel 1:1–7). This reaction, including Darius's delay (Daniel 6:14), shows a major contrast to the personality of Nebuchadnezzar. Nebuchadnezzar reacted quickly and violently to disobedience (Daniel 3:19–22). Darius was reluctant to punish Daniel where his predecessor needed no prodding to carry out the death sentence. Daniel appears more like Pilate, the governor who reluctantly condemned Jesus rather than stand up to a mob (John 19:6, 12 16).
Expand
Expand
Expand
What is the Gospel?
Download the app: